Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266383›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2025

CAR T-cells for acute leukemias in children: current status, challenges, and future directions.

Marie Emilie Dourthe, André Baruchel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Have CARs stalled for non-B-cell malignancies? Where are we, and where are we going?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marie Emilie DourthePediatric Hematology-Immunology Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) and Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
André BaruchelPediatric Hematology-Immunology Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) and Université Paris Cité, Paris, France. andre.baruchel@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CAR T-cells therapy is seen as one of the most promising immunotherapies for leukemias, since targeting CD19 has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in children, adolescents, and young adults. Early phase clinical trials have shown a very high initial response rate confirmed by follow up and real-world studies. However, almost half of patients relapse with the available commercial product currently suggesting the need of a consolidative treatment after CAR T-cell infusion in well-defined cases, according to several pre- and post-CAR clinical and biological factors. This finding highlights that numerous challenges exist before the extension of CAR T-cell indications (first relapse and high-risk first line) in the field of B-ALL: to enhance persistence of CAR T-cells to avoid CD19-positive relapse and to avoid CD19-negative relapse by reducing tumor burden pre-CAR-T infusion and/or by multitargeting. Promising approaches with exciting early clinical data are emerging in the field of T-cell ALL. The use of CAR T-cells for acute myeloid leukemias remains challenging due to the lack of leukemia-specific antigens and to the immunosuppressive microenvironment.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLeukemiaPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAdolescentAntigens, CD19ChildHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAntigens, CD19Receptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAcute lymphoblastic leukemiaAcute myeloid leukemiaCAR T-cellsChildrenImmunotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.