ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Integrated care networks in multidisciplinary rehabilitation therapy services for childhood oncology close to home: lessons learned from an international environmental scan.
Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- RADAR-ES: A Methodological Framework for Conducting Environmental Scans in Health Services Delivery Research.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntegrated care networks (ICNs) close to home have the potential to improve continuity and quality of care for children with cancer and their families during and after treatment. Our goal is to develop such a network for multidisciplinary rehabilitation therapy services (RTS) in The Netherlands, but we lacked a good understanding of an ICN and the factors to make it successful. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to learn from initiatives in ICN's internationally, how are ICN's developed, how does it promote collaboration and what are facilitators and barriers in its development and use?
methodsWe performed an environmental scan. First, we performed a systematic literature search (PubMed) focussing on ICNs for childhood oncology. Secondly, we sent a survey regarding development and use of ICNs to international childhood cancer centers. Participating centers were asked to share information about their initiatives in providing care close to home. Data were summarized descriptively and analyzed using content analysis.
resultsThe literature search did not reveal any relevant publications. The results from the survey, including15 countries, provided valuable insights in the understanding of a good ICN, its facilitators and barriers, and the potential added value of developing ICNs close to home to provide continuity and quality of care.
conclusionsOur study highlights the perceived importance of ICNs for multidisciplinary RTS in pediatric oncology and provides valuable information for the formation of such a network. Information about the needs from the perspectives of children and parents is currently missing and essential to develop successful ICNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.