ReviewJournal of molecular modeling2025
Local reaction condition optimization via machine learning.
Review in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextReaction condition optimization addresses shared requirements across academia and industry, particularly in chemistry, pharmaceutical development, and fine chemical engineering. This review examines recent progress and persistent challenges in machine learning-guided optimization of localized reaction conditions, with an emphasis on three core aspects: dataset, condition representation, and optimization methods, as well as the main issues in each related stage. The review explores challenges such as dataset scarcity, data quality, and the "completeness trap" in dataset preparation stage, summarizes the limitations of current molecular representation techniques in condition representation stage, and discusses the search efficiency challenges of optimization methods in optimization stage.
methodsThe review analyzes the molecular representation techniques and identifies them as the primary bottleneck in advancing localized reaction condition optimization. It further examines existing optimization methodologies. Among them, Bayesian optimization and active learning emerges as the most commonly applied approaches in this field, utilizing incremental learning mechanisms and human-in-the-loop strategies to minimize experimental data requirements while mitigating molecular representation limitations. The review concludes that advancements in molecular representation techniques are essential for developing more efficient optimization methods in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40266356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.