Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266356›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular modeling2025

Local reaction condition optimization via machine learning.

Wenhuan Song, Honggang Sun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenhuan SongSchool of Mechanical, Electrical & Information Engineering, Shandong University, Weihai, 264209, China. wh.songcs@gmail.com.
Honggang SunSchool of Mechanical, Electrical & Information Engineering, Shandong University, Weihai, 264209, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextReaction condition optimization addresses shared requirements across academia and industry, particularly in chemistry, pharmaceutical development, and fine chemical engineering. This review examines recent progress and persistent challenges in machine learning-guided optimization of localized reaction conditions, with an emphasis on three core aspects: dataset, condition representation, and optimization methods, as well as the main issues in each related stage. The review explores challenges such as dataset scarcity, data quality, and the "completeness trap" in dataset preparation stage, summarizes the limitations of current molecular representation techniques in condition representation stage, and discusses the search efficiency challenges of optimization methods in optimization stage.

methodsThe review analyzes the molecular representation techniques and identifies them as the primary bottleneck in advancing localized reaction condition optimization. It further examines existing optimization methodologies. Among them, Bayesian optimization and active learning emerges as the most commonly applied approaches in this field, utilizing incremental learning mechanisms and human-in-the-loop strategies to minimize experimental data requirements while mitigating molecular representation limitations. The review concludes that advancements in molecular representation techniques are essential for developing more efficient optimization methods in the future.

Indexed as

Dataset challengesMachine learningMolecular representationReaction condition optimization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.