Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266339›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

The use of orthogonal plain radiographs in determining the position of thoracic pedicle screws: a cadaveric study.

Naresh Kumar, Si Jian Hui, Aye Sander Zaw, Gabriel Zihui Leow, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, K Joshua, Jonathan Jiong Hao Tan, Hee-Kit Wong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naresh KumarNational University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. dosksn@nus.edu.sg.
Si Jian HuiNational University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Aye Sander ZawNational University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Gabriel Zihui LeowNational University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
James Thomas Patrick Decourcy HallinanNational University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
K JoshuaNational University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Jonathan Jiong Hao TanNational University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Hee-Kit WongNational University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlain radiography remains the standard for intra- and post-operative assessment of pedicle screw placement in spine surgery. While newer technologies like intraoperative CT and navigation have been introduced, they do not consistently improve thoracic pedicle screw accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of anteroposterior (AP) alone versus orthogonal (AP and lateral) radiographs in assessing thoracic pedicle screw position across different observer experience levels and to determine the reliability of traditional fluoroscopy as compared to newer modalities. MATERIALS AND

methods23 disarticulated adult thoracic vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws placed either intra-osseous or with deliberate medial or lateral cortical violations. True AP and lateral radiographs were independently reviewed by two spine surgeons, two trainees, and two radiologists, blinded to actual screw positions. They categorized screws as "inside pedicle," "out laterally," "out medially," or "unsure." Assessments were compared to confirmed positions using axial views and direct visualization.

resultsOrthogonal radiographs had 74.3% accuracy in screw position assessment and 77.3% accuracy in detecting cortical breaches, outperforming AP-only views. Lateral breaches were most easily identified, while intra-osseous placement was most often misclassified. Notably, 20.5% of medial breaches were incorrectly identified as intra-osseous, most commonly by radiologists. Surgeons were more accurate and cautious than both trainees and radiologists in reporting screw placement.

conclusionOrthogonal radiography remains a viable tool for thoracic pedicle screw assessment if used judiciously. Surgical experience enhances interpretation accuracy, particularly in identifying medial breaches, which carry a notable risk of being reported as intra-osseous.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsSpinal FusionThoracic VertebraeAdultAgedCadaverFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsAccuracyMedial penetrationOrthogonal radiographsScrew placementThoracic pedicle screws

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.