ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
Lateral closing wedge high tibial osteotomy procedure for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: eleven years mean follow up analysis.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients Undergoing Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The ageing meniscus: Pathophysiology, epidemiology and management.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Medial hinge fracture after closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: Proposing a new classification and risk factor analysis of a neglected complication.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Return to farming after orthopedic surgery: A systematic review.World journal of orthopedics · 2026Article
- Novel anatomically contoured locking plate shows improved anatomic conformity vs. a conventional T-shaped plate in anterior popliteus transtibial-tuberosity high tibial osteotomy: a radiologic comparison.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess long term survivorship, patient reported (PROMs) and radiological outcomes, and rate of adverse events and hardware removal after lateral closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) and varus malalignment.
methodsRetrospective analysis of patients who underwent isolated CWHTO for medial OA in varus knee between 2009 and 2019 at the same institution was performed. Surgical failure was defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or need for osteotomy revision procedure for varus recurrence, while clinical failure was defined by a Lysholm score under 65 points. Lysholm score, Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), and patients' satisfaction with the treatment were evaluated. Radiographic parameters assessed included OA degree with the Kellgren Lawrence scale (KL), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and posterior tibial slope (PTS). Adverse events and rate of hardware removal procedures were recorded through follow up visits and clinical records. Survival analysis was conducted through Kaplan-Meier method with surgical and clinical failure as endpoints.
results70 knees (mean age at surgery 43.3 years) were included in the survivorship analysis at a mean follow up of 11.6 ± 3.4 years. A failure rate of 12.85% (9/70) was recorded during the follow up period, with a survivorship of 92% and 75% at ten and 15 years of follow up, respectively. Mean Lysholm score and VAS at follow up were above the PASS threshold reported in literature. The 75.7% of patients were satisfied with the treatment. Radiological follow up indicated a residual mechanical varus of 2.1°, a decrease of 0.7° of intra articular deformity (JLCA), no change in PTS nor in KL index. The adverse events rate recorded was 5.7% (4/70). In nine knees (14.7%) among the patients survived from surgical failure a subsequent hardware removal procedure was performed.
conclusionCWHTO represents a safe procedure, which resulted in high survivorship (92% and 75% at ten and 15 years follow up, respectively), with satisfactory PROMs and radiological outcomes at long term follow up in patients affected by medial OA and varus malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5, Case Series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.