Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266289›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing education scholarship2025

Examining perspectives of instructors and students on the instruction of care plans within the nursing process - a qualitative inquiry.

Meltem Özduyan Kılıç, Fatoş Korkmaz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing education scholarship, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meltem Özduyan Kılıç37504 Ankara University Faculty of Nursing , Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-0892
Fatoş KorkmazHacettepe University, Faculty of Nursing, Ankara, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4457-8691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to systematically explore the perspectives of nursing instructors and students concerning the pedagogical aspects of patient care plan instruction.

methodsThis qualitative descriptive study was conducted between October 10, 2022, and January 17, 2023, at a public university in Ankara, Turkey. Data were gathered through seven focus group interviews involving eight instructors and 27 students, employing semi-structured interview questions. Thematic analysis was used.

resultsThe average age of the nurse educators was 36.87 years; all were female, 75 % had a Ph.D. degree, and the average number of years of professional experience was 10.12. The average age of the students was 20.40 years; 66.67 % were female, and 40.74 % were second-year students. After examining interview data, three overarching themes emerged for instructors and students:

conclusionsThe findings underscored a notable challenge: instructors struggled to provide optimal interaction with students due to overwhelming group sizes during care plan activities. Concurrently, students faced difficulties across all phases of the nursing process when formulating patient care plans. To strengthen the teaching of specific patient care planning, it is recommended that the number of faculty members be increased and that information and communication technologies be used in clinical education. IMPLICATIONS FOR AN INTERNATIONAL AUDIENCE: This study's findings can help nursing faculties understand the various dimensions of the needs of nursing process education. Furthermore, nurse instructors' and students' opinions can promote technology integration in nursing education.

Indexed as

Education, NursingFaculty, NursingNursing CarePatient Care PlanningStudents, NursingAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalenursingnursing educationnursing studentpatient care planning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.