Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266226›Full record

ArticleTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society

Reactivation of Chagas Disease in the Central Nervous System Among Heart Transplant Recipients: A Clinical Series From Brazil, 2006-2023.

Jacqueline Ferreira de Oliveira, Ana Luiza Barbosa, Gláucia Cota, Fábio Morato de Castilho, Silvio Amadeu de Andrade, Guilherme Ferraz Messina de Pádua Andrade, Juliana Rodrigues Soares Oliveira, Paulo Pereira Christo, Breno Franco Silveira Fernandes, Rodrigo Santiago Gomez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jacqueline Ferreira de OliveiraDivision of Internal Medicine, Transplant Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9845-9826
Ana Luiza BarbosaDivision of Internal Medicine, Transplant Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Gláucia CotaDivision of Internal Medicine, Transplant Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Fábio Morato de CastilhoDepartment of Cardiology and Heart Transplantation, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Silvio Amadeu de AndradeDepartment of Cardiology and Heart Transplantation, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Guilherme Ferraz Messina de Pádua AndradeDepartment of Cardiology and Heart Transplantation, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Juliana Rodrigues Soares OliveiraDepartment of Cardiology and Heart Transplantation, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Paulo Pereira ChristoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Breno Franco Silveira FernandesDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Rodrigo Santiago GomezDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Israel MolinaInfectious Diseases Department, Tropical Medicine Unit Vall d'Hebron-Drassanes, Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, PROSICS Barcelona, CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease is a relevant cause of heart transplantation. The risk of reactivation is a potential concern. This study aimed to describe the reactivation of Trypanosoma cruzi in the central nervous system (CNS).

methodsWe performed a retrospective study of all heart transplants for Chagas disease undertaken between 2006 and 2023 at a single institution in Brazil to define the prevalence of neurological reactivation and reviewed clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with CNS T. cruzi involvement.

resultsAmong 187 Chagas disease recipients, 11 episodes of neurologic reactivation were identified in nine patients, at a median of 160 days after transplant. Two patients had a relapse more than a year after the first episode. Three patients died and the remaining six had neurological sequelae. Of the 11 episodes of CNS reactivation, eight were confirmed based on finding T. cruzi parasites or DNA in cerebrospinal fluid or brain tissue biopsy, the remaining three episodes were considered probable by demonstrating parasites in blood and other tissues. Focal neurological manifestations (8 of 11 episodes) and a single lesion with the predominant involvement of white matter (6 of 11 episodes) were the most common features. Brain biopsy was the gold standard tool, detecting five of seven CNS reactivation. T. cruzi PCR in cerebrospinal fluid confirmed two of three cases, and direct examination has a low diagnostic yield, detecting only one of six episodes.

conclusionNeurological Chagas reactivation is a rare and severe posttransplant complication that should be considered in any at-risk heart recipient.

Indexed as

Central Nervous SystemChagas DiseaseHeart TransplantationLatent InfectionTrypanosoma cruziAdultAgedBrainBrazilFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTransplant Recipientscentral nervous systemChagas diseaseheart transplantreactivationT. cruzi

Identifiers

PMID40266226
PMCPMC12017318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.