ArticleVaccines2025
Glycosylated Receptor-Binding-Domain-Targeting Mucosal Vaccines Protect Against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and MERS-CoV.
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Rational design of an optimized ferritin nanoparticle vaccine targeting both SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe pathogenic coronaviruses (CoVs) MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, which are responsible for the MERS outbreak and the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively, continue to infect humans, with significant adverse outcomes. There is a continuing need to develop mucosal vaccines against these respiratory viral pathogens to prevent entry and replication at mucosal sites. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the CoV spike (S) protein is a critical vaccine target, and glycan masking is a unique approach for designing subunit vaccines with improved neutralizing activity.
methodsWe evaluated the efficacy of mucosal immunity, broad neutralizing activity, and cross-protection afforded by a combined glycosylated mucosal subunit vaccine encoding the RBDs of the original SARS-CoV-2 strain (SARS2-WT-RBD), the Omicron-XBB.1.5 variant (SARS2-Omi-RBD), and MERS-CoV (MERS-RBD).
resultsIntranasal administration of the three-RBD protein cocktail induced effective, durable IgA and systemic IgG antibodies specific for the S protein of these CoVs, thereby neutralizing infection by pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2-WT, Omicron-XBB.1.5, and MERS-CoV. The mucosal vaccine cocktail protected immunized mice from challenge with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-XBB.1.5 and MERS-CoV, leading to a significant reduction in the viral titers in the lungs. By contrast, the individual glycosylated RBD proteins only induced such immune responses and neutralizing antibodies against either SARS-CoV-2 or MERS-CoV, protecting against subsequent challenge with either SARS-CoV-2 or MERS-CoV; they did not provide simultaneous protection against both CoVs.
conclusionsThis study describes a unique strategy for designing efficacious mucosal subunit vaccines that induce durable mucosal immunity, cross-neutralizing activity, and cross-protection against SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, highlighting the potential for the design of mucosal vaccines against other pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.