Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266196›Full record

ArticleVaccines2025

Inflammatory and Humoral Immune Responses to Commercial Autogenous

Chrysta N Beck, Jossie M Santamaria, Gisela F Erf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diet-vaccine interactions: SQM Iron andApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chrysta N BeckDepartment of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas System, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-3205-1285
Jossie M SantamariaDepartment of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas System, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-8705-5146
Gisela F ErfDepartment of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas System, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2106-3484

Funding

USDA-NIFA SAS 2019-69012-29905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesCommercial poultry flocks undergo

methodsLBL pullets received primary (14 wks) or secondary (19 wks) vaccination by i.d. growing feather (GF) pulp injection of SV1, SV2,

resultsPrimary vaccine administration increased local heterophil and macrophage levels and increased IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA expressions at 6 h p.i., independent of treatment. Secondary administration extended these local immune activities through 3 d p.i. and included prolonged IL-17A mRNA expression. Primary and secondary GF-pulp injection with V resulted in rapid lymphocyte recruitment by 6 h p.i., comprised primarily of CD4

conclusionsThese commercial-killed

Indexed as

antibodychickeninflammationinnate immunitySalmonella vaccineT cells

Identifiers

PMID40266196
PMCPMC11946197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.