ReviewVaccines2025
Which Proteins? The Challenge of Identifying the Protective Antigens for Next-Generation Capripoxvirus Vaccines.
Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of multiple antigens for use in indirect ELISAs for detection of anti-capripoxvirus antibodies in sheep, goats, and cattle.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Recombinant P32 and B5R proteins of lumpy skin disease virus as candidate antigens for serodiagnostic applications.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Global expansion of lumpy skin disease: transmission trends, economic consequences, and preventive measures.Veterinary research communications · 2025Review
- Lumpy Skin Disease Virus Pathogenesis: Viral Protein Functions and Comparative Insights from Vaccinia Virus.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Novel multi-epitope vaccine candidate for lumpy skin disease: Computational design and recombinant expression.Veterinary world · 2025Article
- Two proteins, one goal: ELISAs based on p32 and L1R for LSDV antibodies detection.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sheeppox, goatpox, and lumpy skin disease continue to negatively impact the sheep, goat, and cattle industries in countries where these diseases are present and threaten to spread into new regions. Effective vaccines are available for disease control and eradication. However, commercial vaccines are based on live attenuated virus isolates and therefore it is not currently possible to differentiate between infected and vaccinated animals (DIVA), which severely limits the use of these vaccines in countries that are free from disease and at risk of an incursion. The development of next-generation vaccines, including recombinant protein, viral-vectored, and mRNA, has been limited due to the lack of understanding of the protective antigen(s) of capripoxviruses. The complexity of capripoxviruses, with up to 156 open reading frames, makes the identification of protective antigen(s) difficult. This paper identifies the most promising antigens by first considering the membrane-associated proteins and then further selecting proteins based on immunogenicity and their role in immunity by comparing them to known orthopoxvirus homologues. From the 156 potential antigens, 13 have been identified as being the most likely to be protective. Further evaluation of these proteins, as immunogens, would be required to identify the optimal combination of immunodominant antigen(s) for the development of next-generation capripoxvirus vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.