ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2025
Association between dental fracture and amalgam restoration: a case-control study.
Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the possible clinical association between dental fracture and the presence of amalgam restorations, including other restorative treatments in the control group. The potential association of fractures with dental wear facets and the restoration size was also assessed as a secondary objective. METHODOLOGY: Patients with fractured teeth restored with silver amalgam or not were included as the case group (n=25). The control group, with non-fractured teeth, was selected after considering the case group aspects, with twice as many patients (n=50) with posterior teeth sound or restored (amalgam, composite resin, or another restorative material). For both groups, the type of restorative material, extension of the restorations, remaining tooth structure, and the presence or absence of wear facets were analyzed. The teeth were impressed with alginate, and from the plaster models, the extent of fractures or restorations was measured by two calibrated examiners with a digital caliper at the cervico-occlusal and bucco-lingual directions. The data were subjected to the Chi-square test (5%) and odds ratio.
resultsThere was no statistical difference between the presence or absence of amalgam restorations regarding the risk of tooth fracture. Regarding fractures larger than 3.5mm, the chances of failure are 0.53 for amalgam restorations with no statistical differences (p=0.433), and, regarding the presence of wear facets, the odds ratio of failure is 1.357 for amalgam restorations (p=0.65).
conclusionIt can be deduced that, within the conditions of the study, no discernible association exists between dental fractures and the presence of silver amalgam restorations.Clinical Trial Register: (ReBEC) UNT code U1111-1215-7255.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.