ArticleAging2025
Impact of Factor Xa inhibitors on cardiovascular events in older patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Article in Aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExperimental studies have reported that Factor Xa inhibitors (Xa-Is) have positive effects on cardiac muscles and blood vessels via protease-activated receptor 2 inhibition, suggesting the preventive effects of Xa-Is on cardiovascular events. However, the clinical impact of Xa-Is on cardiovascular disease is unknown.
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the incidence of cardiovascular events among older patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) taking Xa-Is compared with those taking non-Xa-Is.
methodsWe conducted a single-center historical cohort study of consecutive patients with NVAF who were aged ≥80 years and used oral anticoagulants. Xa-Is included rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, and non-Xa-Is included dabigatran and warfarin. The outcome of cardiovascular events was defined as a composite outcome of congestive heart failure, arteriosclerotic disease, and cardiovascular death. We compared the 5-year incidence of cardiovascular events between patients taking Xa-Is and those taking non-Xa-Is.
resultsOf 1705 patients aged ≥80 years who were diagnosed with AF, 1092 patients with NVAF were enrolled. Propensity score matching provided 445 patients in each group. The risks of cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, arteriosclerotic disease, and cardiovascular death were significantly lower in the Xa-I group than in the non-Xa-I group (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.43 [0.30-0.61], 0.44 [0.29-0.66], 0.47 [0.22-1.04], and 0.41 [0.23-0.75], respectively).
conclusionsAmong patients with NVAF who were aged ≥80 years, the incidence of cardiovascular events was lower in the Xa-I users than in the non-Xa-I users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.