ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2025
Themes in the Management of Pediatric Brain Death Contestation: Exploratory Qualitative Work From Multidisciplinary Health Professionals in the United States.
Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore health professionals' experiences of contested pediatric brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) cases, including factors contributing to conflict, resource needs and utilization, perceived utility of supports available, and case resolution and aftermath. DESIGN AND
methodsInductive thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Contestation of Pediatric Brain Death Task Force.
settingTen institutions across seven U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
participantsNineteen Task Force members were interviewed in 2023, including pediatric intensivists, neurologists, nurses, respiratory therapists, attorneys, palliative care clinicians, social workers, ethicists, and hospital leadership. Task Force members were recruited primarily because of their experience with contested BD/DNC, although some were recruited because of expertise in other relevant topics, such as communication, information acquisition in BD/DNC, and health equity.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsWe identified five themes relevant to managing pediatric BD/DNC contestation: 1) personnel to consider involving, including subspecialty consultation, social work, hospital leadership and administration, ethics teams, legal counsel, and security; 2) timelines to maintain, including factors to consider when deciding the most appropriate family accommodations; 3) support for families and patients, including strategies to enhance communication, identifying and mitigating mistrust, and connecting families with support both within and outside the hospital; 4) support for staff, including disseminating information throughout the care team, staff support for one another, and establishing written documentation and policies; and 5) complementary strategies that may augment approaches to BD/DNC contestation, such as policies addressing requests for potentially inappropriate treatment.
conclusionsFamily contestation of pediatric BD/DNC challenges all parties involved. The five themes identified from our qualitative analysis of interviews with experienced professionals do not constitute SCCM clinical practice guidance, but they will be used to inform the development of approaches to BD/DNC contestation through further scholarship and community consultation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.