ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2025
Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of teicoplanin in renal transplant patients.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to investigate the population pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of teicoplanin in renal transplant patients and to provide recommendations for optimal teicoplanin dosing regimens. A total of 99 renal transplant patients with 386 plasma samples were enrolled (306 in development and 80 in validation). A population PK analysis and simulations were performed to identify the optimal teicoplanin doses needed to provide an 80% probability of target attainment at 72 h and 168 h using both a trough concentration target of >15 µg/mL and the ratio of 24 h area under the concentration-time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration >610.4. Teicoplanin was well described by a two-compartment PK model. The final model parameter estimates for clearance, central compartment volume of distribution, intercompartmental clearance, and peripheral compartment volume were 0.711 L/h, 11.3 L, 4.22 L/h, and 35.2 L, respectively. Creatinine clearance (CrCL) was the only covariate that significantly affected teicoplanin clearance. Dosing simulation results showed that standard dosing regimens were unable to meet the treatment needs of all patients, and CrCL-based individual dosing regimens are recommended for both loading dose and maintaining dose. Higher-than-standard teicoplanin doses are necessary to achieve prompt and appropriate drug exposure in renal transplant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.