ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Estimating Maize Leaf Water Content Using Machine Learning with Diverse Multispectral Image Features.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel indices and multi-source data fusion for monitoring plant moisture stress in winter wheat fields.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid ACO-random forest optimization framework for scalable microalgae biomass estimation using multispectral imaging.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2025Article
- Estimating Maize Leaf Area Index Using Multi-Source Features Derived from UAV Multispectral Imagery and Machine Learning Models.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leaf water content (LWC) is a key physiological parameter for assessing maize moisture status, with direct implications for crop growth and yield. Accurate LWC estimation is essential for water resource management and precision agriculture. This study introduces a high-precision method for estimating maize LWC utilizing UAV-based multispectral imagery combined with a Random Forest Regression (RFR) model. By extracting vegetation indices, image coverage, and texture features and integrating them with ground-truth data, the study examines the variation in LWC estimation accuracy across different growth stages. The results indicate that the RFR model performs optimally during the seedling stage, with a root relative mean square error (RRMSE) of 2.99%, whereas estimation errors are larger during the tasseling stage, with an RRMSE of 4.13%. Moreover, the RFR model consistently outperforms multiple linear regression (MLR) and ridge regression (RR) models throughout the growing season, demonstrating lower errors on both training and testing datasets. Notably, the RFR model exhibits significantly reduced errors in the training dataset compared to both MLR and RR models. Following particle swarm optimization (PSO), the prediction accuracy of the RFR model is notably enhanced, with the RRMSE on the training dataset decreasing from 1.46% to 1.19%. This study provides an effective approach for estimating maize LWC across different growth stages, supporting crop water management and precision agriculture, and offering valuable insights for the estimation of water content in other crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.