Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265916›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Estimating Maize Leaf Water Content Using Machine Learning with Diverse Multispectral Image Features.

Yuchen Wang, Jianliang Wang, Jiayue Li, Jiacheng Wang, Hanzeyu Xu, Tao Liu, Juan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuchen WangCollege of Hydraaulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Jianliang WangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5733-4202
Jiayue LiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Jiacheng WangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Hanzeyu XuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6352-2963
Tao LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Juan WangCollege of Hydraaulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7680-5030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaf water content (LWC) is a key physiological parameter for assessing maize moisture status, with direct implications for crop growth and yield. Accurate LWC estimation is essential for water resource management and precision agriculture. This study introduces a high-precision method for estimating maize LWC utilizing UAV-based multispectral imagery combined with a Random Forest Regression (RFR) model. By extracting vegetation indices, image coverage, and texture features and integrating them with ground-truth data, the study examines the variation in LWC estimation accuracy across different growth stages. The results indicate that the RFR model performs optimally during the seedling stage, with a root relative mean square error (RRMSE) of 2.99%, whereas estimation errors are larger during the tasseling stage, with an RRMSE of 4.13%. Moreover, the RFR model consistently outperforms multiple linear regression (MLR) and ridge regression (RR) models throughout the growing season, demonstrating lower errors on both training and testing datasets. Notably, the RFR model exhibits significantly reduced errors in the training dataset compared to both MLR and RR models. Following particle swarm optimization (PSO), the prediction accuracy of the RFR model is notably enhanced, with the RRMSE on the training dataset decreasing from 1.46% to 1.19%. This study provides an effective approach for estimating maize LWC across different growth stages, supporting crop water management and precision agriculture, and offering valuable insights for the estimation of water content in other crops.

Indexed as

leaf water contentmachine learningmultispectral imageUAVwheat

Identifiers

PMID40265916
PMCPMC11945138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.