ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Fencing vs. Grazing: Divergent Effects on Soil Seed Bank Structure and Grassland Recovery Pathways in Northern Tibetan Alpine Grasslands.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alpine grasslands are a critical component of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau ecosystem, but their soil seed bank (SSB) patterns and driving mechanisms remain unclear under the influence of climate change and human activities. This study analyzed grazing exclusion (via fencing) and grazing effects using 12 sites in the alpine steppe (AS) and alpine desert steppe (AD) in northern Tibet to analyze the effects of fencing and grazing management, as well as hydrothermal and soil factors, on the SSB density and diversity. Linear regression models were applied to explore the relationships between the SSB density and environmental factors, while comparisons of the management modes revealed the potential impacts of fencing. The results show that fencing significantly increased the SSB density and diversity, especially in the AS, while grazing negatively impacted the SSB density and the Pielou evenness index. Hydrothermal factors strongly influenced the SSB in the AS, with the density positively correlated with precipitation and negatively with temperature, while responses in the AD were weak. Soil factors, such as the available phosphorus (SAP) and available potassium (SAK), were key to SSB formation in the AD, whereas ammonium nitrogen (NH4_N) and the pH were critical in the AS. Fencing optimized the hydrothermal conditions and nutrient availability, promoting SSB recovery, though its effects varied between the grassland types. This study provides scientific insights for alpine grassland restoration and sustainable management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.