Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265838›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Fencing vs. Grazing: Divergent Effects on Soil Seed Bank Structure and Grassland Recovery Pathways in Northern Tibetan Alpine Grasslands.

Yuyuan Xie, Yongjie Liu, Wencheng Li, Ningning Zhao, Xuehao Li, Yifan Chen, Guozhi Lai, Xin Lou, Xiangtao Wang, Xuehong Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuyuan XieCollege of Animal Science, Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China.
Yongjie LiuSouthwest Survey and Planning Institute of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Kunming 650216, China.
Wencheng LiQiangtang Alpine Grassland Ecosystem Research Station (Jointly Built with Lanzhou University), Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3753-0238
Ningning ZhaoQiangtang Alpine Grassland Ecosystem Research Station (Jointly Built with Lanzhou University), Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China.
Xuehao LiCollege of Animal Science, Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China.
Yifan ChenCollege of Animal Science, Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China.
Guozhi LaiCollege of Animal Science, Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China.
Xin LouQiangtang Alpine Grassland Ecosystem Research Station (Jointly Built with Lanzhou University), Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China.
Xiangtao WangQiangtang Alpine Grassland Ecosystem Research Station (Jointly Built with Lanzhou University), Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China.
Xuehong WeiCollege of Animal Science, Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFF1304300Science and Technology Plan Projects of Tibet Autonomous Region GZFCG2022-7717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alpine grasslands are a critical component of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau ecosystem, but their soil seed bank (SSB) patterns and driving mechanisms remain unclear under the influence of climate change and human activities. This study analyzed grazing exclusion (via fencing) and grazing effects using 12 sites in the alpine steppe (AS) and alpine desert steppe (AD) in northern Tibet to analyze the effects of fencing and grazing management, as well as hydrothermal and soil factors, on the SSB density and diversity. Linear regression models were applied to explore the relationships between the SSB density and environmental factors, while comparisons of the management modes revealed the potential impacts of fencing. The results show that fencing significantly increased the SSB density and diversity, especially in the AS, while grazing negatively impacted the SSB density and the Pielou evenness index. Hydrothermal factors strongly influenced the SSB in the AS, with the density positively correlated with precipitation and negatively with temperature, while responses in the AD were weak. Soil factors, such as the available phosphorus (SAP) and available potassium (SAK), were key to SSB formation in the AD, whereas ammonium nitrogen (NH4_N) and the pH were critical in the AS. Fencing optimized the hydrothermal conditions and nutrient availability, promoting SSB recovery, though its effects varied between the grassland types. This study provides scientific insights for alpine grassland restoration and sustainable management.

Indexed as

alpine grasslandgrazegrazing exclusionnorthern Tibetsoil seed bank

Identifiers

PMID40265838
PMCPMC11944786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.