ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Bottom Cooling During Culture Initiation Increases Survival and Reduces Hyperhydricity in Micropropagated Cannabis Plants.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperhydricity is characterized by morphological abnormalities and reduced plant vigour. This study investigated the use of a bottom cooling system (creating an approximate 2 °C temperature differential) during culture initiation to evaluate the impact on hyperhydricity in cannabis micropropagation. Nodal explants from two clonal triploid cultivars known to exhibit hyperhydricity, Higher Education 1 (HED-1) and Higher Education 2 (HED-2), were surface sterilized and placed in culture tubes using standard methods. Treatments included bottom cooling, metal pads without bottom cooling, and standard shelving (controls-no pad). Various morphological and physiological traits were assessed, including a detached leave water loss assay, dry mass, chlorophyll content, and survival rate. Plants cultured with bottom cooling showed significantly higher survival rates, healthier appearance, and improved physiological parameters compared to controls. In contrast, many control explants were hyperhydric with translucent and brittle leaves. Quantitative data revealed significant improvements in fresh weight (54.84% for HED-1 and 51.42% for HED-2), dry weight (36% for HED-1 and 8% for HED-2), chlorophyll fluorescence ratios (7.24% for HED-1 and 9.18% for HED-2), chlorophyll content (18.38% for HED-1 and 20.67% for HED-2), and cuticle/stomate function (30% for HED-1 and 27.27% for HED-2) using bottom cooling. Moreover, our morphological observation showed that almost 85% of control plants were hyperhydric, whereas only 10% of the plants cultured with a bottom cooling system were hyperhydric. This study confirmed that bottom cooling helps reduce the rate and impacts of hyperhydricity in cannabis and significantly improves the survival and quality of in vitro plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.