ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2025
Infant Formula in the Digital Age: How US Online Formula Marketing Targets Parents.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recommendations by the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (the Code), regulatory bodies in the United States continue to permit commercial milk formula (CMF) marketing that threatens public health. The increasing popularity of online shopping highlights the need for more research on virtual CMF product marketing. To assess marketing strategies from the e-customer standpoint, we analyzed a sample of 26 bestselling virtual infant formula (IF) products from three US-based e-commerce giants. All product display content, including visual and audible components, was evaluated according to Code guidelines, analyzed thematically and assessed for theme co-occurrence. No IF labels were compliant with the Code due to widespread health benefit claims and idealization of IF. Furthermore, no US-based products were compliant with critical Code guidelines for powdered IF reconstitution instructions. Thematic analysis of virtual product web pages revealed 17 themes, of which four were novel to public health literature: purity, nature, innovation and eco-friendly. These themes co-occurred in patterned ways to capture consumers. The most popular online IF products in the United States combine Code violations with compelling online materials that idealize IF and shape cultural expectations about infant feeding and care. These practices reinforce the formula industry's well-documented efforts to undermine breastfeeding. A review of US regulations and implementation of the Code is urgently needed to protect public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.