ReviewEuropean journal of clinical investigation2025
The evolving role of positron emission tomography in precision prostate cancer biopsy.
Review in European journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective head-to-head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- The evolving role of positron emission tomography in precision prostate cancer biopsy.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers among men, and accurate detection and diagnosis are crucial for effective treatment planning. Diagnostic prostate biopsy plays a pivotal role in the detection and characterization of prostate cancer. Recent advancements in molecular imaging, particularly with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) using radiolabelled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) tracers, have shown significant improvements in enhancing prostate cancer detection. PSMA PET, when combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hybrid PET/MRI systems, provides improved sensitivity and specificity, enabling more precise localization of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) lesions. This narrative review explores the evolving role of PET/CT and PET/MRI-guided prostate biopsy. We examine the integration of PET with MRI for the detection of prostate cancer, highlighting key studies that have demonstrated improved diagnostic outcomes. Additionally, we discuss the current limitations, including the high costs and longer scan times associated with PET/MRI, as well as the challenges in data interpretation. The review also considers emerging technologies, such as promising molecular probes for prostate PET imaging, such as gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) and fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI). Finally, the present work provides the clinician with a comprehensive yet concise up-to-date review of the literature to easily evaluate the possibilities currently offered by hybrid imaging technologies of personalized imaging-guided biopsy for prostate cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.