ReviewMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2025
Long-Read Sequencing: The Third Generation of Diagnostic Testing for Dystonia.
Review in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Etiologies of Dystonia with Anarthria/Aphonia.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026Article
- Unified long-read panel for Parkinson's and repeat expansion disorders.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Nanopore long-read sequencing facilitates accurate diagnosis of KMT2B-related dystonia.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Integrating Long-Read Nanopore Sequencing for Precision Resolution of Genomic Variants in Dystonia.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- The Changing Face of Dystonia-Enhancing Diagnosis by Moving Beyond Traditional Clinical Phenotyping.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-read sequencing methodologies provide powerful capacity to identify all types of genomic variations in a single test. Long-read platforms such as Oxford Nanopore and PacBio have the potential to revolutionize molecular diagnostics by reaching unparalleled accuracies in genetic discovery and long-range phasing. In the field of dystonia, promising results have come from recent pilot studies showing improved detection of disease-causing structural variants and repeat expansions. Increases in throughput and ongoing reductions in cost will facilitate the incorporation of long-read approaches into mainstream diagnostic practice. Although these developments are likely to transform clinical care, there is currently a discrepancy between the potential benefits of long-read sequencing and the application of this technique to dystonia. In this review we highlight current opportunities and limitations of adopting long-read sequencing methods for the investigation of patients with dystonia. We provide examples of long-read sequencing integration into diagnostic evaluation and the study of pathomechanisms in individuals with dystonic disorders. The goal of this article is to stimulate research into the application and optimization of long-read analysis strategies in dystonia, thus enabling more precise understanding of the underlying etiology in the future. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.