Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265716›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2025

Identifying the Diagnostic Challenges and Indicators of Orthostatic Tremor: Patient Perspectives.

Wietske A Babeliowsky, Kiel Woodward, Bart Swinnen, Sarah Doss, Michael Muir, Rob M A de Bie, Diego R Torres-Russotto, Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wietske A BabeliowskyDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-7532-5320
Kiel WoodwardMovement Disorders Section, Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Bart SwinnenDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8098-880X
Sarah DossMovement Disorders Section, Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Michael MuirAmerican OT Community.
Rob M A de BieDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5267-0784
Diego R Torres-RussottoMovement Disorders Section, Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Anne-Fleur van RootselaarDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of orthostatic tremor (OT) is challenging because of its non-specific symptoms and a broad range of differential diagnosis, resulting in a complex and lengthy diagnostic journey.

objectiveThe aim was to assess the diagnostic delay in OT and to identify key clinical indicators as reported by patients.

methodsIn 2019, the American OT community developed and distributed a web-based survey titled "Symptoms and Diagnosis of Orthostatic Tremor (OT)." The survey included questions on demographics, the diagnostic process, and symptomatology.

resultsAn international cohort of 360 OT patients participated in the study, of which 147 with electromyography (EMG)-confirmed and 213 symptom-based OT. In the EMG-confirmed OT group, respondents reported an average diagnostic delay of 7.4 (±8.5) years on average, attributed to delays at both the patient and physician level. A diagnosis was made by a movement disorders specialist in 75 (51.0%) of 147 cases. Misdiagnosis initially occurred in 57 (38.8%) of 147 patients, whereas 49 (33.3%) of 147 patients suspected OT before receiving a formal diagnosis. OT was commonly reported a progressive condition. The most frequent symptoms on standing that prompted patients to seek medical attention included: "shakiness/tremors in both legs" (92.5%), "feelings of unsteadiness or imbalance" (75.5%), "toe curling" (61.9%), and the "feeling of falling while standing" (45.6%). Notably, 70.0% of respondents reported experiencing anxiety at least occasionally. These findings closely align with the findings of the symptom-based OT group.

conclusionThis study underscores a significant diagnostic delay in OT and identifies key clinical indicators, which could facilitate earlier diagnosis.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisDizzinessTremorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesclinical indicatorsdiagnosisdiagnostic delayorthostatic tremor

Identifiers

PMID40265716
PMCPMC12371454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.