ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2025
Self-Administered Taste Testing Without Water: Normative Data for the 53-Item Waterless Empirical Taste Test (WETT).
Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Taste dysfunction in Long COVID.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Self-Administered Taste Testing Without Water: Normative Data for the 53-Item Waterless Empirical Taste Test (WETT).International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccording to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), more than 20 million Americans suffer from chronic taste problems. Unfortunately, quantitative testing is rarely performed, self-reports are inaccurate, and "taste" is often confused with olfaction-dependent flavors. Clearly, a reliable, practical, and norm-based clinical taste test is sorely needed.
methodsThe recently developed 53-item Waterless Empirical Taste Test (WETT) was self-administered by 1392 healthy subjects (493 men and 899 women) spanning the ages of 10-94. Normative percentile ranks were developed, and the influences of sex, age, COVID-19 infection history, and smoking behavior were evaluated using general linear models.
resultsOn average, WETT scores declined with age beginning in the 30s and were lower in men than in women (ps < 0.0001), with the sex difference most apparent between 40 and 70 years of age. Subtest scores for the five basic taste qualities followed similar age- and sex-related patterns. No influences of COVID-19 history were evident. Smokers had lower salty (NaCl) and bitter (caffeine) WETT scores than nonsmokers. The developed normative tables make it possible to determine a patient's absolute dysfunction score as well as a relative score based on age- and sex-related percentiles.
conclusionThis study provides normative data based on 1392 healthy subjects for interpreting a patient's performance on a reliable self-administered taste test that requires no liquid stimuli or rinses. Its findings support the view that both sex and age are significant determinants of taste function in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.