Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265642›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2025

Solid-Supported Polymer Membranes: How Different Deposition Methods Influence Their Inner Morphology and Properties.

Moritz S Muthwill, Manuel Kraus, Maryame Bina, Mirela Malekovic, Ionel Adrian Dinu, Cornelia G Palivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moritz S MuthwillBiointerfacing Nanomaterials Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 22, BPR 1096, Basel 4002, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0470-0779
Manuel KrausBiointerfacing Nanomaterials Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 22, BPR 1096, Basel 4002, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0004-5223-2417
Maryame BinaBiointerfacing Nanomaterials Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 22, BPR 1096, Basel 4002, Switzerland.
Mirela MalekovicBiointerfacing Nanomaterials Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 22, BPR 1096, Basel 4002, Switzerland.
Ionel Adrian DinuBiointerfacing Nanomaterials Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 22, BPR 1096, Basel 4002, Switzerland.
Cornelia G PalivanBiointerfacing Nanomaterials Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 22, BPR 1096, Basel 4002, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7777-5355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid-supported polymer membranes (SSPMs) resulting from the self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers are in focus for the development of functional surfaces with enhanced stability and more chemical versatility compared to lipid-based membranes. Different methods are used to generate such polymer planar membranes, but their internal organization and the resulting properties have not yet been compared to identify the differences and guide the selection of appropriate membranes for specific applications. Here, we present SSPMs prepared by two deposition methods─the Langmuir monolayer transfer and the solvent-assisted polymer deposition─and evaluate their internal organization and key properties. Using two different amphiphilic copolymers, a diblock and a triblock, we explored the effect of the deposition method on the resulting membranes. While the Langmuir monolayer transfer method generates condensed, homogeneous planar membranes, the ones produced by the solvent-assisted polymer deposition method have a different molecular organization. Properties, including thickness, wettability, roughness and elasticity were influenced by the membrane deposition method. Differences in inner morphology and properties of membranes generated by these two deposition methods are more pronounced for triblock-based copolymer membranes than for diblock copolymer ones. Our comparative study highlights the importance of selecting a specific preparation method to achieve SSPMs with properties tailored for desired applications.

Identifiers

PMID40265642
PMCPMC12060281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.