ArticleHealth promotion international2025
A scoping review of sense of coherence and salutogenesis among LGBTQ+ populations.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sense of coherence as moderator of the predictive power of personality variables on sexual satisfaction-a structural equation modeling approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Salutogenesis and sense of coherence can buffer the effects of external threats such as stigma, discrimination, and emergencies. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ+) communities globally face discrimination, prejudice, and victimization. Understanding salutogenesis and sense of coherence among LGBTQ+ people could improve policy and health promotion responses and reduce the impact of these stressors on LGBTQ+ people's health. This scoping review addressed the following question: To what extent has salutogenesis, either qualitatively or through measurement of sense of coherence, been explored among LGBTQ+ populations globally? Systematic searches of five databases identified 448 unique sources: 413 were excluded through title and abstract screening, and 18 by full-text screening. Of the 17 included studies, 14 were quantitative, two qualitative, and one mixed methods. Studies recruited participants from 11 high-income countries. Two-thirds (11) recruited participants only from within the LGBTQ+ community and six had more broadly based samples. The studies sampled a diverse range of subpopulations and subgroups from a variety of contexts limiting generalizability. The quantitative measure of sense of coherence most often used was the SoC-13 (n = 7), however, heterogeneity in the results reporting prevented quantitative synthesis. The limited evidence suggests that sense of coherence may be lower in LGBTQ+ populations than in comparison groups of cisgender heterosexuals, at least in some contexts, and is related to measures of wellbeing and discrimination. Further research is needed to understand how sense of coherence and its dimensions influence, and is influenced by, LGBTQ + people's life experiences and resources and their responses to external stressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.