ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Community listening to understand determinants of healthy eating in an Australian priority community.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Food Environment Assessment in Two Socioeconomic Contexts in Queensland, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unhealthy dietary behaviour is associated with several adverse health outcomes. However, individual dietary choices aren't solely the function of personal habits and are influenced by various environmental factors. This study aimed to identify the social determinants of dietary behaviours in a priority Australian community. We utilized community listening to explore the priority community members' narratives and experiences about the determinants influencing their dietary behaviour. Those determinants were then categorized under the lens of the Socio-ecological Model. The suburb of Inala; a low socioeconomic, multiethnic community in Southwest Brisbane, Queensland, Australia was selected to listen to the voices of community members, health professionals, social workers, teachers, and community service providers. Researchers listened to hundreds of stories from 168 community members throughout the project. Participants identified personal interest in healthy eating, knowledge of healthy food and preparation; and time constraints for healthy food preparation, which were subsequently categorized under individual-level (microsystem) determinants of dietary behaviour. Family support, parental influence, and commitments were identified as other determinants that were categorized under social-environment level (mesosystem) determinants. Availability of fresh fruits and vegetables and ubiquity of fast-food outlets were the other factors identified, which were listed under physical-environment (exo-system) determinants; and finally, cost of living, inculturation, and dissatisfaction with health practitioners were identified and categorized under policy-level (macrosystem) determinants. The complex relationship between personal, sociocultural, and environmental factors with dietary behaviour presented in this study highlights the need for multi-component and culturally tailored initiatives to enable healthy eating in priority communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.