Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265625›Full record

ArticleReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2025

Evaluation of Different Cryoprotectant Combinations in Vitrification and Slow Freezing for Ovarian Tissue Preservation in Domestic Cats.

Rayane Brandão Ribeiro, Aline Queiroz Rodrigues, Beatriz Alves de Aguiar, Jessyca Karoline Oliveira Silva, Marcus Vinicius Rocha de A Carvalho da Costa, Julliene Larissa Dos Santos Bezerra, Yasmin Barboza Ferreira, Ingrid Gracielle Martins da Silva, Tathyana Benetis Piau, Carolina Madeira Lucci and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rayane Brandão RibeiroDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Aline Queiroz RodriguesDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Beatriz Alves de AguiarDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Jessyca Karoline Oliveira SilvaDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Marcus Vinicius Rocha de A Carvalho da CostaDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Julliene Larissa Dos Santos BezerraDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Yasmin Barboza FerreiraDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Ingrid Gracielle Martins da SilvaDepartment of Cellular Biology, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Tathyana Benetis PiauDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Carolina Madeira LucciDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Sônia Nair BáoDepartment of Cellular Biology, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Jair Trapé GoulartDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Paula Maria Quaglio BelloziFaculty of Health Sciences, Molecular Pharmacology Laboratory, University of Brasilia, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.
Fernanda PauliniDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasilia-DF, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4490-9614

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-BrasilNational Council for Scientific and Technological DevelopmentUniversidade de Brasília
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising this, it becomes imperative to implement strategies aimed at mitigating this concerning conservation scenario. For this, female fertility preservation is crucial in this context, and studies concerning this field are still scarce. In the realm of cryopreservation, prevalent methods involve slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (V). This study aimed to evaluate various cryoprotective combinations for V or SF processes applied to domestic cat ovarian tissue. Twenty ovaries from 10 healthy cats were dissected, and cortical regions were sectioned into eight fragments measuring 3 mm

Indexed as

CryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsFertility PreservationOvaryVitrificationAnimalsCatsDimethyl SulfoxideFemaleFreezingOvarian FollicleTrehaloseCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideTrehaloseanimal reproductioncryopreservationfelinesovarian follicles

Identifiers

PMID40265625
PMCPMC12016461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.