ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Economic costs of liver abscesses in U.S. beef feedlot cattle: a comprehensive economic analysis.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outer membrane vesicles fromVirulence · 2026Article
- Effects of dietary starch concentration and feeding management regimen on bacterial pathogens in liver abscesses and ruminal and colonic epithelial tissues in feedlot steers.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Cattle type and liver abscess occurrence impact aged beef steak instrumental retail color and metabolomics.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Retrospective analysis of illness and liver abscesses in low-risk, crossbred beef cattle.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Association of origin, performance, and health metrics of beef-on-dairy feedyard cattle with liver abscess at harvest.Translational animal science · 2026Article
- Seasonal relationship between liver abscesses and feeding behavior in crossbred beef cattle.Translational animal science · 2026Article
- Disease Prediction in Cattle: A Mixed-Methods Review of Predictive Modeling Studies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Evaluation of gastrointestinal and fecal microbial communities as markers of liver abscess risk in beef feedlot cattle.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver abscesses (LA) cause significant economic losses in U.S. beef feedlot cattle through a variety of production and performance effects. This research estimated annual economic losses secondary to LA in U.S. beef feedlot cattle using a stochastic simulation model that was based on data from the literature, economic data, and expert opinion. LA prevalence was estimated for 4 U.S. regions and 4 cattle types along with their combinations. Economic losses were estimated by combining modeling results from individual loss categories related to feed efficiency, liver, offal, and trim loss, effects on carcass quality, and processing delays. Losses were also estimated under different antimicrobial use and production scenarios. We estimated that LA result in annual losses of $256M (95% Credible interval: $162M to $378M) to the U.S. beef industry. Decreased average daily gain (ADG) and a lower dressing percentage prior to trimming accounted for nearly half (48.6%) of these losses, while liver and offal condemnation and excess trimming comprised approximately 40% of all losses. Processing delays were estimated to contribute approximately 5% of the total losses. There was also substantial variation in the estimated prevalence and impacts of LA by region and cattle type, with beef-dairy crossbred (BD) cattle in the Western region experiencing the highest economic losses per animal. Scenario analyses predicted that eliminating the use of tylosin may nearly double LA prevalence and associated economic costs while transitioning all beef cattle born on dairies from Holsteins to BD cattle would only slightly increase overall losses. Our findings show that LA cause substantial, yet uncertain, losses to the U.S. beef feedlot industry. The results also emphasize the need for additional research to elucidate the effect of LA on feed efficiency and to improve LA prevention strategies, which could enhance animal health and productivity as well as industry sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.