ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2025
Time to Thrombolytics and Tissue Salvage: Assessing Response Following Severe Frostbite Injury.
Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frostbite: diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and future directions.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Clinical course and management of extremity frostbite in populations under forced movement in border regions.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Synthesis of Protocols for Frostbite Care From the FROST Study Sites.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately 30% of severe frostbite injuries result in amputation. Thrombolytic therapy is used to reduce tissue loss following severe frostbite injury. This study evaluates factors impacting the effectiveness of thrombolytics using post-treatment perfusion imaging and amputation level as outcome measures. We hypothesize that categorizing thrombolytic-treated patients into full, partial, and nonresponders enable a nuanced evaluation of treatment effectiveness. A prospectively maintained frostbite database was reviewed for patients with post-rewarming perfusion deficits measured by Tc99 scans who received IV thrombolytics. Of 131 patients, 71% were full responders, 23.7% were partial responders, and 5.3% were nonresponders for surgical outcome. The median time to thrombolytics was 5.5 h (range 1-14.5) for full responders; 7 h (range 3.5-14) for partial responders; and 10 h (range 1.5-11.5) for nonresponders. Full responders exhibited smaller initial perfusion deficits. Psychosocial or comorbid factors were not significantly different across groups. Nonresponse was associated with a longer time to thrombolytics, larger perfusion deficits, and cellulitis/infection. Using imaging outcomes to reduce confounding by infection, 93 patients were evaluated: 28% were full responders, 57% were partial responders, and 15% were nonresponders. Full responders for imaging outcomes corresponded with surgical outcomes and had no amputations, while 37.7% of partial responders and 42.9% of nonresponders on imaging outcomes had amputations. This study is the largest to evaluate thrombolytic outcomes in severe frostbite-injured patients, showing nearly 95% of patients improve after thrombolytic treatment for severe frostbite injury. This provides new insight into thrombolytic responses and a novel assessment of thrombolytic treatment efficacy. These findings underscore the importance of timely thrombolytic administration and demonstrate benefits for patients treated outside the standard thrombolytic treatment windows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.