Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265459›Full record

ArticleBiotech (Basel (Switzerland))2025

Direct Shoot Regeneration from the Finger Millet's In Vitro-Derived Shoot Apex and Genetic Fidelity Study with ISSR Markers.

Theivanayagam Maharajan, Veeramuthu Duraipandiyan, Thumadath Palayullaparambil Ajeesh Krishna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Theivanayagam MaharajanDivision of Plant Molecular Biology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola Collège, Chennai 600034, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7343-2854
Veeramuthu DuraipandiyanDivision of Plant Molecular Biology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola Collège, Chennai 600034, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-3503
Thumadath Palayullaparambil Ajeesh KrishnaDivision of Plant Molecular Biology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola Collège, Chennai 600034, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7788-4436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, people are cultivating finger millet, an important cereal, to improve food availability and health benefits for humans. However, the biotechnological research on this millet is limited and insufficient in this field. The primary focus of this study is to optimize an efficient regenerated protocol for initiating further plant transformation studies, using the shoot apex as an explant and various growth regulators. For example, three cytokinins (BAP, TDZ, and Kin) at different concentrations were used to induce multiple shoots of finger millet. Among these, TDZ (4.5 µM) provided the maximum number (17.3) of shoots as compared to BAP and Kin. IBA (2.46 µM), along with MS medium, was used for the induction of roots, where 5.6 roots were produced in an individual shoot and the length of the root was longer with a size of 8.2 cm after two weeks of incubation. The clonal fidelity of the in vitro regenerated plantlets of finger millet was confirmed by ISSR primers. Overall, the present work developed a robust and reliable procedure for the establishment of efficient and reproducible regeneration through the shoot apex that will be useful for the genetic improvement of this crop. The genetic enhancement of these millets as well as the successful creation of transgenic plant varieties modified for resistance to biotic and abiotic challenges in the near future would be aided by this study.

Indexed as

clonal fidelityfinger millettissue culture

Identifiers

PMID40265459
PMCPMC12015885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.