ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2025
A Review of Newborn Screening for VLCADD: The Wisconsin Experience.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Very-long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCADD) is due to a defect in metabolism of long-chain fatty acids. Infants with VLCADD may experience cardiomyopathy, hypoglycemia, or even death; thus, early detection and intervention is crucial. The spectrum of disease and natural variation in newborn metabolism, however, lead to overlap in acylcarnitine values between affected and unaffected individuals, which contributes to the difficulty in identifying true positive cases while minimizing false positive cases. VLCADD was added to the state of Wisconsin's newborn screening (NBS) panel in 2000. A previous retrospective review of VLCADD screen positive cases identified between 2000 and 2014 resulted in a change to the screening algorithm. Following implementation, a reduction in the percentage of false positive screens from 25.3% to 20.4% was observed between 2015 and 2021. The overall PPV also decreased, from 37.2% to 28%, due to an increase in the number of carriers identified (27.5% of cases in 2000-2014 and 51.8% of cases in 2015-2021). A data review also identified three long-chain acylcarnitine elevations (C14:1, C14:1/C16, and C14:1/C2) that had statistically significant differences in concentrations in true positive populations versus false positive populations. Utilization of the C14:1, C14:1/C16, and C14:1/C2 values in newborn screening may provide clearer distinction between true positive and carrier populations and additionally increase the PPV of this screen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.