Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265427›Full record

ReviewCurrent medical imaging2025

Transforming Medical Imaging: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Integration in PACS for Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy and Workflow Efficiency

Alberto I Pérez-Sanpablo, Jimena Quinzaños-Fresnedo, Josefina Gutiérrez-Martínez, Irma G Lozano-Rodríguez, Ernesto Roldan-Valadez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alberto I Pérez-SanpabloResearch Division, Human Motion Analysis Laboratory and Rehabilitation Engineering Department, National Institute of Rehabilitation Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, 14389, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0550-928X
Jimena Quinzaños-FresnedoNeurologic Rehabilitation Division, National Institute of Rehabilitation Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, 14389, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2780-6878
Josefina Gutiérrez-MartínezDivisión de Investigación en Ingeniería Médica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación "Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra", 14389, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4047-4257
Irma G Lozano-RodríguezNeurologic Rehabilitation Division, National Institute of Rehabilitation Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, 14389, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0006-1810-8505
Ernesto Roldan-ValadezDivision of Research, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion 'Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra', 14389, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7116-5289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo examine the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) and assess its impact on medical imaging, diagnostic workflows, and patient outcomes. This review explores the technological evolution, key advancements, and challenges associated with AI-enhanced PACS in healthcare settings.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, covering articles from January 2000 to October 2024. Search terms included "artificial intelligence," "machine learning," "deep learning," and "PACS," combined with keywords related to diagnostic accuracy and workflow optimization. Articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on peerreviewed studies that discussed AI applications in PACS, innovations in medical imaging, and workflow improvements. A total of 183 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.

resultsAI integration in PACS has significantly enhanced diagnostic accuracy, achieving improvements of up to 93.2% in some imaging modalities, such as early tumor detection and anomaly identification. Workflow efficiency has been transformed, with diagnostic times reduced by up to 90% for critical conditions like intracranial hemorrhages. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated exceptional performance in image segmentation, achieving up to 94% accuracy, and in motion artifact correction, further enhancing diagnostic precision. Natural language processing (NLP) tools have expedited radiology workflows, reducing reporting times by 30-50% and improving consistency in report generation. Cloudbased solutions have also improved accessibility, enabling real-time collaboration and remote diagnostics. However, challenges in data privacy, regulatory compliance, and interoperability persist, emphasizing the need for standardized frameworks and robust security protocols. Conclusions The integration of AI into PACS represents a pivotal transformation in medical imaging, offering improved diagnostic workflows and potential for personalized patient care. Addressing existing challenges and enhancing interoperability will be essential for maximizing the benefits of AIpowered PACS in healthcare.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingRadiology Information SystemsWorkflowHumansArtificial intelligenceCloud computingDeep learningDiagnostic accuracyHealthcare systems.InteroperabilityMachine learningMedical imagingNatural language processingPACS

Identifiers

PMID40265427
PMCPMC13223497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.