ReviewJournal of cell science2025
Origin and evolution of mitochondrial inner membrane composition.
Review in Journal of cell science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The molecular mechanisms of crista formation: how mitochondria give themselves breathing room.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- Rewiring mitochondrial phosphatidylethanolamine metabolism identifies new and unaccounted trafficking steps.Journal of lipid research · 2026Article
- Rewiring Mitochondrial Phosphatidylethanolamine Metabolism Identifies New and Unaccounted Trafficking Steps.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Saturated cardiolipins are potent disruptors of inner mitochondrial membrane structure and function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mitochondria transfer in tissue homeostasis and diseases.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Symbiosis is woman: the pioneering role of women scientists.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Comprehensive review on alcohol-induced protein modifications in hepatic mitochondrial membranes and their functional implications.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unique membrane architectures and lipid building blocks underlie the metabolic and non-metabolic functions of mitochondria. During eukaryogenesis, mitochondria likely arose from an alphaproteobacterial symbiont of an Asgard archaea-related host cell. Subsequently, mitochondria evolved inner membrane folds known as cristae alongside a specialized lipid composition supported by metabolic and transport machinery. Advancements in phylogenetic methods and genomic and metagenomic data have suggested potential origins for cristae-shaping protein complexes, such as the mitochondrial contact site and cristae-organizing system (MICOS). MICOS protein homologs function in the formation of cristae-like intracytoplasmic membranes (ICMs) in diverse extant alphaproteobacteria. The machinery responsible for synthesizing key mitochondrial phospholipids - which cooperate with cristae-shaping proteins to establish inner membrane architecture - could have also evolved from a bacterial ancestor, but its origins have been less explored. In this Review, we examine the current understanding of mitochondrial membrane evolution, highlighting distinctions between prokaryotic and eukaryotic mitochondrial-specific proteins and lipids and their differing roles in shaping cristae and ICM architecture, and propose a model explaining the concurrent specialization of the mitochondrial lipidome and inner membrane structure in eukaryogenesis. We discuss how advancements across a range of disciplines are shedding light on how multiple membrane components co-evolved to support the central functions of eukaryotic mitochondria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.