Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265190›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

DNA sequence analysis landscape: a comprehensive review of DNA sequence analysis task types, databases, datasets, word embedding methods, and language models.

Muhammad Nabeel Asim, Muhammad Ali Ibrahim, Arooj Zaib, Andreas Dengel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad Nabeel AsimGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Muhammad Ali IbrahimGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Arooj ZaibDepartment of Computer Science, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Andreas DengelGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) serves as fundamental genetic blueprint that governs development, functioning, growth, and reproduction of all living organisms. DNA can be altered through germline and somatic mutations. Germline mutations underlie hereditary conditions, while somatic mutations can be induced by various factors including environmental influences, chemicals, lifestyle choices, and errors in DNA replication and repair mechanisms which can lead to cancer. DNA sequence analysis plays a pivotal role in uncovering the intricate information embedded within an organism's genetic blueprint and understanding the factors that can modify it. This analysis helps in early detection of genetic diseases and the design of targeted therapies. Traditional wet-lab experimental DNA sequence analysis through traditional wet-lab experimental methods is costly, time-consuming, and prone to errors. To accelerate large-scale DNA sequence analysis, researchers are developing AI applications that complement wet-lab experimental methods. These AI approaches can help generate hypotheses, prioritize experiments, and interpret results by identifying patterns in large genomic datasets. Effective integration of AI methods with experimental validation requires scientists to understand both fields. Considering the need of a comprehensive literature that bridges the gap between both fields, contributions of this paper are manifold: It presents diverse range of DNA sequence analysis tasks and AI methodologies. It equips AI researchers with essential biological knowledge of 44 distinct DNA sequence analysis tasks and aligns these tasks with 3 distinct AI-paradigms, namely, classification, regression, and clustering. It streamlines the integration of AI into DNA sequence analysis tasks by consolidating information of 36 diverse biological databases that can be used to develop benchmark datasets for 44 different DNA sequence analysis tasks. To ensure performance comparisons between new and existing AI predictors, it provides insights into 140 benchmark datasets related to 44 distinct DNA sequence analysis tasks. It presents word embeddings and language models applications across 44 distinct DNA sequence analysis tasks. It streamlines the development of new predictors by providing a comprehensive survey of 39 word embeddings and 67 language models based predictive pipeline performance values as well as top performing traditional sequence encoding-based predictors and their performances across 44 DNA sequence analysis tasks.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputational biologycomputational genomicsdeep learningDNA sequence analysis

Identifiers

PMID40265190
PMCPMC12011883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.