Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265182›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

A pilot study of disulfiram for individuals with persistent symptoms despite prior antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease.

Mara Kuvaldina, Jessica Preston, Denise McClellan, Martina Pavlicova, Thomas H Brannagan, Brian A Fallon

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03891667 (Disulfiram), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03891667 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Disulfiram ("Antabuse"): A Test of Symptom Reduction Among Patients With Previously Treated Lyme Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorResearch Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc.Ran2019 to 2022Enrolled11ConditionsFatigue, Quality of LifeArmsDisulfiram
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mara KuvaldinaLyme and Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Jessica PrestonLyme and Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Denise McClellanLyme and Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Martina PavlicovaDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Thomas H BrannaganDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Brian A FallonLyme and Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Materials and methods: Participants with a history of previously treated Lyme disease and persistent fatigue were randomly assigned in a double-blinded fashion to either Group A (disulfiram for 4 weeks and placebo for 4 weeks) or Group B (disulfiram for 8 weeks). Primary outcome endpoint was at 10 weeks with a follow-up at 14 weeks. The primary aim was to assess safety and tolerability. A clinical aim assessed signs of clinical improvement using well-validated measures, focusing on improvement in fatigue and quality of life. Target enrollment was 24 participants. Results: 940 individuals were screened, 11 were enrolled and nine participated in the trial. Dosing started low and increased based on response and tolerance to a maximum of 500 mg daily. Safety. Two participants discontinued medication due to clinical worsening, one of whom was briefly hospitalized. Three additional participants were withdrawn from treatment due to lab test abnormalities. Tolerability. Only three of nine participants completed the full course of treatment (two in Group A and one in Group B). Lower doses were better tolerated than the highest dose. Clinical response. Of nine participants, clinically meaningful improvement was noted in fatigue for six and in quality of life for four. Among the six fatigue responders, improvement was also noted on a multiple domain symptom index (six of six), overall symptom burden (five of six), and functional impairment (four of six). The study was terminated early due to end of project funding, higher than expected adverse events, and recognition that sufficient information was gathered to inform future studies. Conclusions and relevance: This study reveals the risks associated with disulfiram, especially at higher doses, while suggesting potential clinical benefits among some participants. Efficacy could not be assessed given the small sample size and the lack of a placebo-control group. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03891667?cond=Lyme%20Disease&intr=disulfiram&rank=1, NCT03891667.

Indexed as

Chronic Lyme Diseaseclinical trialdisulfiramfatiguepost-treatment Lyme diseasequality of life

Identifiers

PMID40265182
PMCPMC12013529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.