ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Worst pattern of invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: An independent prognostic indicator.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metadherin: A pivotal oncogene and therapeutic target in head and neck cancer - a systematic review.The Japanese dental science review · 2026Review
- Unraveling the relationship among lifestyle, tumor eruption site, histopathological grading, and oral squamous cell carcinoma: A clinicopathological study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Proteomic identification and histopathological validation of candidate biomarkers CA1, HBB, Torsin A, andFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Oral squamous cell carcinoma is a malignancy that is biologically aggressive. Objective: To investigate the correlation between various histopathological factors and the worst patterns of invasion at the tumor-host interface, which were classified as cohesive (1-3) and non-cohesive (4&5). Methods: Neck dissections were performed on 81 cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma those had been diagnosed. The selection was limited to paraffin-embedded blocks that contained sections from the tumor. Tumor staging, nodal staging and other factors such as lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, extra nodal extension, depth of invasion, margin status and tumor differentiation grades were documented. Results: The findings indicate a higher frequency of non-cohesive worst invasion patterns in numerous anatomical sites. A prediction accuracy of 69.1 % was obtained from the logistic regression analysis, suggesting that the predictive performance has also improved. The chi square test results demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between the variable of interest and extranodal extension showing a p value of 0.008 while lymph node status also showed significant with a p value of 0.000. Another factor that depicted a significance with worst pattern of invasion was tumor margin status having a p value of 0.046. Lymphovascular invasion and the worst pattern of invasion also exhibited a statistically significant correlation, with a p-value of 0.013. Conclusion: The results of this investigation indicate that aggressive tumor biology is associated with non-cohesive worst pattern of invasion. Non-cohesive worst pattern of invasion is associated with moderate differentiation grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, extranodal extension, closed or involved tumor margins and nodal metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.