Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265116›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Volatile-mediated plant interactions: an innovative approach to cultivar mixture selection for enhanced pest resilience.

Dimitrije Markovic, Gaëtan Seimandi-Corda, Vili Harizanova, Atanaska Stoeva, Sari Himanen, Stephanie Saussure, Andja Radonjic, Gordana Đurić, Ivana Lalićević, Sokha Kheam and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dimitrije Markovic *Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Gaëtan Seimandi-Corda *Protecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Vili HarizanovaAgricultural University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Atanaska StoevaAgricultural University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Sari HimanenNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokioinen, Finland.
Stephanie SaussureNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokioinen, Finland.
Andja RadonjicFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Gordana ĐurićFaculty of Agriculture, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Ivana LalićevićInstitute for Plant Protection and Environment, Belgrade, Serbia.
Sokha KheamDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Merlin RensingDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jannicke GallingerDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Samantha M CookProtecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Velemir NinkovicDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixing different cultivars has been recognized as a promising strategy for the reduction of pest pressure and the enhancement of crop performance. However, this applies only in specific combinations, creating a need to select cultivars that interact synergistically in mixtures. We propose a trait-based laboratory method to identify complementary pairs of cereal cultivars based on their ability to prime one another's defense response through volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In this study, we screened 25 locally-grown cultivars from six European countries to assess their responsiveness to volatile priming under controlled conditions. The tested cultivars exhibited three primary types of volatile interactions: no interaction, one-way interaction (where one cultivar responded to volatiles from another) and two-way interaction (where both cultivars reciprocally responded). Subsequently, the efficacy of these cultivar pairs was evaluated over a three-year period in field trials where aphid infestation, natural enemy abundance and plant traits (height, number of plants per 1-meter, Thousand Grain Weight (TGW) and yield) were assessed. Field trials results demonstrated that only specific cultivar mixtures led to a significant reduction in aphid infestation, indicating a robust genetic and environmental interaction. Mixtures in which both cultivars exhibited two-way interaction under controlled conditions, demonstrated reductions in aphid abundance in comparison to monoculture controls. In contrast, the abundance of natural enemies was not significantly affected by cultivar mixtures, and there were no notable changes in plant traits. We propose that the strategic pairing of cultivars, which actively engage in volatile interactions in the laboratory, can effectively reduce aphid pressure in the field without compromising plant traits or crop yield, thereby reducing reliance on chemical control. Given the role of aphids as vectors of economically significant viruses, reducing their population could also limit the spread of plant diseases in the field. This approach underscores the importance of understanding plant interactions at a chemical level to optimize cultivar pairing and develop sustainable pest management strategies.

Indexed as

aphid infestationaphid population developmentgrain yieldplant-plant communicationspring barleysustainable pest managementwinter wheatwithin species plant diversity

Identifiers

PMID40265116
PMCPMC12011781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.