Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265106›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Enhancing biometric identification using 12-lead ECG signals and graph convolutional networks.

Maram Al Alfi, Pedro Peris-Lopez, Carmen Camara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maram Al AlfiComputer Science and Engineering Department, University Carlos III of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro Peris-LopezComputer Science and Engineering Department, University Carlos III of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen CamaraComputer Science and Engineering Department, University Carlos III of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a highly secure biometric modality due to its intrinsic physiological characteristics, making it resilient to forgery and external attacks. This study presents a novel real-time biometric authentication system integrating Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN) with Mutual Information (MI) indices extracted from 12-lead ECG signals. Methods: The MI index quantifies the statistical dependencies among ECG leads and is computed using entropy-based estimations. This index is used to construct a graph representation, where nodes correspond to ECG features and edges reflect their relationships based on MI values. The GCN model is trained on this graph, enabling it to learn complex patterns for user identification efficiently. Results: Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed GCN-MI model achieves 100% accuracy with a 5-layer architecture at a k-fold of 75, outperforming conventional approaches that require less training data. Discussion: This work introduces several innovations: the integration of MI indices enhances feature selection, improving model robustness and efficiency; the graph-based learning framework effectively captures both spatial and statistical relationships within ECG data, leading to higher classification accuracy; the proposed approach offers a scalable and real-time biometric authentication system suitable for applications in finance, healthcare, and personal device access. These findings highlight the practical value of the GCN-MI approach, setting a new benchmark in ECG-based biometric identification.

Indexed as

12 ECG leadselectrocardiogram (ECG)graph convolutional networks (GCN)Identificationmutual information (MI)

Identifiers

PMID40265106
PMCPMC12011792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.