ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025
"Optic nerve of steel": A case of very high intraocular pressures with markedly little visual field progression over years.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: We report a case of pseudoexfoliation glaucoma with exceedingly high intraocular pressures (IOP) but limited visual field progression despite poor adherence with treatment over a 7-year period. Observation: A 67-year-old Eastern European female presented to the emergency room with an IOP of 52 mmHg OD and exam findings consistent with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Subsequent testing demonstrated superior and inferior arcuate deficits on Humphrey visual field (HVF) testing and corresponding thinning of optic nerve OD. The patient was very inconsistent with topical glaucoma medications, and after undergoing selective laser trabeculoplasty she was lost to follow-up without any additional treatment. She returned one year later with an IOP of 59 mmHg, but remarkably stable HVF. The patient refused to restart glaucoma drops and elected instead to proceed with a trabeculectomy OD, which was successfully performed, with the final visual acuity of 20/25 and IOP of 20 mmHg OD. The patient was again lost to follow-up for three years. Her IOP was 40 mmHg OD on return to clinic, but her glaucoma testing revealed very little progression. She decided to pursue placement of glaucoma drainage device (Baerveldt 350) OD, and her IOP was 18 mmHg OD after 6 months on no medications. The patient was lost to follow-up thereafter. Conclusions: The limited visual field progression with chronically high IOP over years strongly argues in favor of IOP-independent mechanisms contributing to pathophysiology of glaucoma. This case also highlights the importance of longitudinal monitoring and tailoring glaucoma therapy holistically to individual patient circumstances.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.