Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40265048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2025

The cerebellar deep nuclei: a patch for rate codes?

Mike Gilbert, Anders Rasmussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mike GilbertSchool of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Anders RasmussenDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural firing rates are thought to represent values which code information. There are drawbacks with using biophysical events to represent numbers. (1) Rate code (like any sequence) is inherently slow to read. (2) At short intervals, the code becomes unintelligible biophysical noise. (3) Transmission times. The vital contribution of the cerebellum to skilled execution and coordination of movements requires precision timing. We present a theory supported by modeling that the output cell group of the cerebellar network is a practical solution to timing problems. In this role, it converts irregularly-patterned firing of Purkinje cells into an effectively instantaneous rate received by output cells, transforms the rate into linear analog modulation of output cell firing, synchronizes firing between output cells, and compensates for lag caused by extracerebellar transmission times. The cerebellum is widely connected to the midbrain and the cerebral cortex and involved in cognitive functions. Modular network wiring suggests that the cerebellum may perform the same computation on input from all sources regardless of where it is from. If so, and the deep cerebellar nuclei make the same contribution to the role of the cerebellum in other functions, an understanding of motor function would also provide insight into the substrate of cognitive functions.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsCerebellar NucleiModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeuronsAnimalsHumansPurkinje Cellscerebellumcodedeep cerebellar nucleimodelnetworktheory

Identifiers

PMID40265048
PMCPMC12011825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.