ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Oral Swab Testing With Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Children Aged <5 Years in Uganda: An Exploratory Interim Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy in the NOD-pedFEND Cohort.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability and feasibility of oral swabs for tuberculosis diagnosis in young children: a qualitative study from Uganda and Peru.Frontiers in tuberculosis · 2026Article
- A Year in Review on Tuberculosis and Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria Disease: A 2026 Update for Clinicians and Scientists.Pathogens & immunity · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Obtaining respiratory samples to diagnose tuberculosis in young children is challenging. Oral swabs are alternative noninvasive specimens for microbiology. Methods: We conducted an interim prospective diagnostic accuracy evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) on oral swabs for pulmonary tuberculosis in children aged <5 years in Uganda. Most children had 2 consecutive swabs collected in a single cryovial (double swabs). Reference tests consisted of Ultra and culture on 2 nasopharyngeal aspirates and 1 gastric aspirate and Ultra on 1 stool. Children were classified as having confirmed tuberculosis, unconfirmed tuberculosis, or unlikely tuberculosis per the National Institutes of Health. Diagnostic accuracy was determined against a microbiological reference standard and a composite reference standard. Results: From August 2021 to February 2024, 444 children were enrolled, of whom 399 had complete classifications: 33 had confirmed tuberculosis, 269 had unconfirmed tuberculosis, 70 had unlikely tuberculosis, and 27 were unclassifiable. The median age was 16 months and 17% had HIV. Most children (398/399) had oral swabs collected, all with conclusive Ultra results. The sensitivity of double swabs was 6.9% with a microbiological reference standard (95% CI, 1.9%-22.0%) and 1.8% with a composite reference standard (95% CI, .8%-4.1%). Specificity was at least 99%. Swabs detected tuberculosis in 4 children with negative reference test results, of whom 3 had unconfirmed tuberculosis. Conclusions: The low sensitivity of Ultra on double swabs precludes its role as a principal diagnostic approach in young children. However, detection of tuberculosis in children who were not otherwise microbiologically diagnosed suggests the utility of oral swabs as add-on samples to increase yield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.