ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Child Physical Abuse Fundamentals in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP).
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical Child Abuse Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP).MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Abusive Bruising and Cutaneous Mimics Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP).MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Child abuse is a highly prevalent yet undertaught condition in medical education. Many physicians feel underprepared to navigate conversations about mandatory reporting. Methods: We developed an interactive module for teaching pediatric clinicians about sentinel injuries and mandatory reporting. We evaluated the content by seeking qualitative and quantitative feedback from a large audience at a pediatric continuing medical education (CME) conference and then studied its educational impact using a pre- and postmodule assessment with residents from three specialties. Based upon audience and expert feedback, the content was then divided into two parts, with an expanded section on disproportionality in part one and popcorn-style role-play in part two. Results: In the CME audience, 98% of participants (85 of 87) rated the content and presentation skills as excellent or very good. In the resident presentations, there were 34 resident participants from three specialties: 24 from a combined audience of pediatric and emergency medicine residents and 10 from an audience of family medicine residents. Median confidence level increased in the pediatric and emergency medicine audience from 4 to 7 and in the family medicine audience from 5 to 7 on a 10-point scale. The median knowledge scores increased in both groups as well, from 75% to 100% and 25% to 100%, respectively. Discussion: This child physical abuse fundamentals module has been presented to a wide range of physician audiences with positive qualitative and quantitative feedback. It is offered here in an expanded two-part workshop that allows for intentional practice of the information taught.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.