ArticleReproductive medicine and biology
Preimplantation genetic testing might not be the necessity for male patients with 47,XYY syndrome: A pilot study.
Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preimplantation genetic testing might not be the necessity for male patients with 47,XYY syndrome: A pilot study.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This pilot study aimed to explore the necessity for 47,XYY syndrome males (couples) to perform PGT rather than conventional In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 36 nonmosaic and mosaic 47,XYY syndrome patients (couples) undergoing 43 oocyte retrieval cycles (37 planned for PGT and 6 for IVF/ICSI) between December 2017 and December 2023. The couples were given either next-generation sequencing-based PGT or conventional IVF/ICSI followed by 45 embryo transfer (ET) cycles (38 from PGT and 7 from IVF/ICSI). The detailed cytogenetic results of the 129 embryos from PGT were analyzed, and the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between PGT-ET and conventional IVF/ICSI-ET cycles were compared. Results: The PGT results showed that the chance of sex chromosome abnormalities was low (1.55%), with chromosomal errors being observed more often in autosomes. Importantly, no differences were observed in the rates of biochemical pregnancy, implantation, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, pregnancy loss, live birth, and preterm delivery between PGT-ET cycles and conventional IVF/ICSI-ET cycles. Comparable results regarding gestational age, birthweight, low birthweight rate, macrosomia rate, male rate, as well as the rate of congenital anomalies were also observed between the two groups. Conclusions: Preimplantation genetic testing might not be necessary to conduct for 47,XYY syndrome males unless there are other indications. Studies with large populations are in demand to confirm the present results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.