Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264953›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025

Use of AI-methods over MD simulations in the sampling of conformational ensembles in IDPs.

Souradeep Sil, Ishita Datta, Sankar Basu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Accurate conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins using reweighting based on NMR chemical shifts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Souradeep SilDepartment of Genetics, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India.
Ishita DattaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Sankar BasuDepartment of Microbiology, Asutosh College (Affiliated with University of Calcutta), Kolkata, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs) challenge traditional structure-function paradigms by existing as dynamic ensembles rather than stable tertiary structures. Capturing these ensembles is critical to understanding their biological roles, yet Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, though accurate and widely used, are computationally expensive and struggle to sample rare, transient states. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a transformative alternative, with deep learning (DL) enabling efficient and scalable conformational sampling. They leverage large-scale datasets to learn complex, non-linear, sequence-to-structure relationships, allowing for the modeling of conformational ensembles in IDPs without the constraints of traditional physics-based approaches. Such DL approaches have been shown to outperform MD in generating diverse ensembles with comparable accuracy. Most models rely primarily on simulated data for training and experimental data serves a critical role in validation, aligning the generated conformational ensembles with observable physical and biochemical properties. However, challenges remain, including dependence on data quality, limited interpretability, and scalability for larger proteins. Hybrid approaches combining AI and MD can bridge the gaps by integrating statistical learning with thermodynamic feasibility. Future directions include incorporating physics-based constraints and learning experimental observables into DL frameworks to refine predictions and enhance applicability. AI-driven methods hold significant promise in IDP research, offering novel insights into protein dynamics and therapeutic targeting while overcoming the limitations of traditional MD simulations.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconformational samplingdeep learningintrinsically disordered proteinsMD simulations

Identifiers

PMID40264953
PMCPMC12011600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.