ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025
Use of AI-methods over MD simulations in the sampling of conformational ensembles in IDPs.
Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Comprehensive evaluation of AlphaFold/OpenFold prediction of experimentally unresolved proteins through novel metrics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Beyond the structure-function paradigm: A comprehensive review of intrinsically disordered proteins.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
- Identification of potential MenT3 inhibitors for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using the generative artificial intelligence and SilicoXplore platform.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Molecular Modeling of the Pathogenetic Mechanisms of Neuropsychiatric Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Accurate conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins using reweighting based on NMR chemical shifts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Multiscale mechanistic insights into sonochemical energy coupling and flavor evolution in Pu‑erh tea.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs) challenge traditional structure-function paradigms by existing as dynamic ensembles rather than stable tertiary structures. Capturing these ensembles is critical to understanding their biological roles, yet Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, though accurate and widely used, are computationally expensive and struggle to sample rare, transient states. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a transformative alternative, with deep learning (DL) enabling efficient and scalable conformational sampling. They leverage large-scale datasets to learn complex, non-linear, sequence-to-structure relationships, allowing for the modeling of conformational ensembles in IDPs without the constraints of traditional physics-based approaches. Such DL approaches have been shown to outperform MD in generating diverse ensembles with comparable accuracy. Most models rely primarily on simulated data for training and experimental data serves a critical role in validation, aligning the generated conformational ensembles with observable physical and biochemical properties. However, challenges remain, including dependence on data quality, limited interpretability, and scalability for larger proteins. Hybrid approaches combining AI and MD can bridge the gaps by integrating statistical learning with thermodynamic feasibility. Future directions include incorporating physics-based constraints and learning experimental observables into DL frameworks to refine predictions and enhance applicability. AI-driven methods hold significant promise in IDP research, offering novel insights into protein dynamics and therapeutic targeting while overcoming the limitations of traditional MD simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.