ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Synthetic O-(2-
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Language-enhanced generative modeling for amyloid PET synthesis from MRI and blood biomarkers.iScience · 2026Article
- Editorial: Artificial intelligence in neurosurgical practices: current trends and future opportunities.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Limited amino acid availability for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging hinders therapeutic decision-making for gliomas without typical high-grade imaging features. To address this gap, we evaluated a generative artificial intelligence (AI) approach for creating synthetic O-(2- Methods: We trained a deep learning (DL)-based model to segment tumors in MRI, extracted radiomic features using the Python PyRadiomics package, and utilized a Random Forest classifier to predict high [ Results: We included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and PET images from 215 studies for the hotspot classification and 211 studies for the synthetic PET generation task. The top-performing radiomic features achieved 80% accuracy for hotspot prediction. From the synthetic [ Conclusion: For the first time, we demonstrate that predicting high [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.