ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Optimization of a bearing geometry for a cervical total disc replacement.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While Total Disc Replacements (TDRs) are generally performing well clinically, reoperation rates indicate that the full potential of the TDR concept might not have been reached. Inspired by the underlying complications related to biomechanics and material longevity that limit the performance of current TDRs, we propose a methodology for the development of TDR-bearings, that addresses such issues. Methods: Our methodology combines finite element model-based optimization with literature derived biomechanical data and an advanced ceramic material to design TDR-bearings. The design optimization aims to functionally replace the structures that are commonly excised (removed) or dissected (cut) during TDR implantation in the anterior column. Results: The optimized bearing geometry was able to replicate the moment-rotation curve of the anterior column of the natural C6/C7 level during coupled flexion/extension-anterior/posterior translation movement. Lateral bending and axial rotation were simulated to ensure the TDR would not fail during these load- and motion profiles. Experimental verification of the finite element model showed the suitability of our simulation approach. Discussion: The combination of computational techniques, advanced materials, and target biomechanical data may allow to overcome limitations of current TDRs and unlock the full potential of the TDR-concept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.