ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Fine spatial-temporal density mapping with optimized approaches for many-core system.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A fine mapping strategy is essential for optimizing the layout and execution speed of large-scale neural networks on many-core systems. However, the benefits of many-core systems diminish when applied to neural networks with significant data and computational demands, due to imbalanced resource utilization between space and time when relying on existing single spatial or temporal mapping strategies. To tackle this challenge, we introduce the concept of spatial-temporal density and propose a spatial-temporal density mapping method to fully leverage both spatial and computational resources. Within the framework of the proposed method, we further introduce two approaches: the Negative Sequence Memory Management (NSM) method, which enhances spatial resource (i.e. core memory) utilization, and the Many-core Parallel Synchronous (MPS) approach, which optimizes computational resource (i.e. core multiply and accumulate units, MACs) utilization. To demonstrate the superiority of these methods, the mapping techniques are implemented on our state-of-the-art many-core chip, TianjicX. The results indicate that the NSM method improves spatial utilization by a factor of 3.05 compared to the traditional Positive Sequence Memory Management (PSM) method. Furthermore, the MPS approach increases computational speed by 6.7% relative to the previously widely adopted pipelined method. Overall, the spatial-temporal density mapping method improves system performance by a factor of 1.85 compared to the commonly employed layer-wise mapping method, effectively balancing spatial and temporal resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.