ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
The effect of neural pre-stimulus oscillations on post-stimulus auditory ERPs in disorders of consciousness.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cognitive Motor Dissociation in Disorders of Consciousness: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.European journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Pre-stimulus oscillations predispose subsequent stimulus detection, but the connection between the pre-stimulus EEG activity and post-stimulus event-related potentials (ERPs) has rarely been examined in people in a disorder of consciousness (DoC). Hence, we investigate how pre-stimulus EEG band power is related to post-stimulus ERPs in individual DoC patients. Methods: We conducted an active auditory oddball paradigm encompassing standard, target and unexpected oddball stimuli with 14 DoC patients ( Results: P3-like differences between brain responses to auditory stimuli were found in seven patients (50%). Delta and theta bands pre-dominated in all patients' pre-stimulus frequency spectra but patients with significant post-stimulus P3 had on average more pre-stimulus beta and gamma power than those without P3 effects. Pre-stimulus power and post-stimulus ERPs correlated in five patients (36%). Several patients showed negative correlations between pre-stimulus gamma and beta power and post-stimulus ERP variables, suggesting a u-shaped relationship between pre-stimulus high-frequency activity and post-stimulus ERP. Only one patient showed a relationship between pre-stimulus alpha and ERP as previously found in healthy people. Conclusion: Pre-stimulus frequencies in DoC were related to post-stimulus processing at least in some patients. The pattern of the relationship showed considerable variability underscoring substantial alterations in brain activity among patients with DoC. The comparison with somatosensory results in the same patients emphasizes the need for multi-modal assessment. Significance: The high inter-individual variability in the connection between pre-stimulus oscillations and auditory processing in DoC necessitates extensive individual assessment to determine optimal stimulation windows for DoC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.