ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Evaluation of Clinical Symptoms of Unilateral S1 Nerve Injury Caused by Disc Herniation the via High Resolution MRI and DTI.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress of diffusion tensor imaging in lumbar degenerative diseases: a narrative review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The status of the herniated disc or nucleus pulposus and the extent of injury and clinical symptoms of the compressed S1 nerve fiber bundle were evaluated by high-resolution Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) techniques. Methods: Forty-two clinically proven patients with unilateral S1 nerve root compression were selected as the case group (n=42), and 20 healthy volunteers were selected as the control group (n=20). The general data, MRI features and DTI parameters were compared between groups. The effective indicators of S1 neurologic fiber bundle damage were screened by univariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and multi-factor logistic regression models were constructed to analyze the diagnostic efficiency of each model. Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender, height, weight, fractional anisotropy (FA) value and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value on both sides of S1 nerve root between groups (P >0.05). The FA value and ADC value of the nerve root on the affected side of the patient were significantly different from those on the healthy side and those on the corresponding side of the control group (all P <0.05), and all of them were effective indicators of the damage of S1 nerve. The sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of the damaged nerve fiber bundle were detected by multi-factor logistic regression models constructed with FA+rFA and FA+rFA+rADC of the affected nerve root, respectively 95.20%, 72.00%, 0.939, and 97.60%, 80.00%, 0.944. Conclusion: High-resolution MRI and DTI can quantitatively evaluate the degree of nerve fiber bundle injury and clinical symptoms caused by lumbar disc herniation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.