ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Indonesian Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07308275 (Longitudinal Evaluation of Direct Neurotization Technique in Breast Reconstruction With Fully Autologous Components), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Longitudinal Evaluation of Direct Neurotization Technique in Breast Reconstruction With Fully Autologous Components: An Assessment of BREAST-Q Sensation Module, Cutaneous Pressure Threshold, Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) Expression, Nerve Fiber Cross-sectional Area, Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density (IENFD), and Breast Morphometry
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The BREAST-Q reconstruction module, a patient-reported outcome measurement tool, is widely used to assess the impact of breast surgery on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life. However, translation to the Indonesian language has not been attempted or used for Indonesian-speaking women with breast cancer. Methods: The Indonesian translation of the BREAST-Q reconstruction module was performed in accordance with the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines, which included forward translation and reconciliation, back translation and review, cognitive debriefing, and cultural adaptation. The respondents who participated in the cognitive debriefing process were recruited from the Metropolitan Medical Centre Hospital, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, and the Indonesian Breast Reconstruction Support Group. Results: The reconciliation meeting revealed that 34.8% of the translated items were discordant between the 2 forward translations, whereas the back-translation review revealed that 11 out of 279 items were discordant between the translated questionnaire and the original version. During the cognitive debriefing process, several comments and recommendations were produced, which were derived from the difficulties of understanding the questionnaires and the cultural context based on local norms, sociodemographics, and religious beliefs. Conclusions: The Indonesian translation of the BREAST-Q reconstruction module has been conducted according to the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.