Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264878›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2025

Innovative approaches to greywater micropollutant removal: AI-driven solutions and future outlook.

Mohamed Mustafa, Emmanuel I Epelle, Andrew Macfarlane, Michael Cusack, Anthony Burns, Mohammed Yaseen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamed MustafaSchool of Computing, Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland Paisley PA1 2BE UK mohammed.yaseen@uws.ac.uk.
Emmanuel I EpelleSchool of Engineering, Institute for Infrastructure and Environment, The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH9 3JL UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9344-2008
Andrew MacfarlaneACS Clothing 6 Dovecote Road Centralpark ML1 4GP UK.
Michael CusackACS Clothing 6 Dovecote Road Centralpark ML1 4GP UK.
Anthony BurnsACS Clothing 6 Dovecote Road Centralpark ML1 4GP UK.
Mohammed YaseenSchool of Computing, Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland Paisley PA1 2BE UK mohammed.yaseen@uws.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2460-1893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greywater constitutes a significant portion of urban wastewater and is laden with numerous emerging contaminants that have the potential to adversely impact public health and the ecosystem. Understanding greywater's characteristics and measuring the contamination levels is crucial for designing an effective recycling system. However, wastewater treatment is an intricate process involving significant uncertainties, leading to variations in effluent quality, costs, and environmental risks. This review addresses the existing knowledge gap in utilising artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the laundry greywater recycling process and elucidates the optimal treatment technologies for the most prevalent micropollutants, including microplastics, nutrients, surfactants, synthetic dyes, pharmaceuticals, and organic matter. The development of laundry greywater treatment technologies is also highlighted with a critical discussion of physicochemical, biological, and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) based on their functions, methods, associated limitations, and future trends. Artificial neural networks (ANN) stand out as the most prevalent and extensively applied AI model in the domain of wastewater treatment. Utilising ANN models mitigates certain limitations inherent in traditional adsorption models, particularly by offering enhanced predictive accuracy under varied operating conditions and multicomponent adsorption systems. Moreover, tremendous success has been recorded with the random forest (RF) model, exhibiting 100% prediction accuracy for both sessile and effluent microbial communities within a bioreactor. The precise prediction or simulation of membrane fouling behaviours using AI techniques is also of paramount importance for understanding fouling mechanisms and formulating efficient strategies to mitigate membrane fouling.

Identifiers

PMID40264878
PMCPMC12013613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.